A restaurant in Middlesborough recently challenged a civil penalty notice of £15,000 issued by the Secretary of State for the Home Department under Section 15 of the Immigration Asylum and Nationality Act 2006 (IANA 2006) arguing that their employee was lawfully present in the UK and that they were not given the opportunity to mitigate the penalty.
However, the Court emphasised that the 2006 Act's purpose was to discourage illegal employment and that employers are responsible for conducting any necessary checks on employees' right to work, according to Section 15(3).
This judgement highlights the importance of employers carrying out right-to-work checks to avoid finding themselves in a similar situation. Ensure your employees have the right to work by using an identity service provider offering Identity Document Validation Technology (IDVT).
19/12/2024 - More...
Over one million parents have now claimed Child Benefit online or via the HMRC app, with 87% of new claims using this
19/12/2024 - More...
Can’t pay your tax bill in full by 31 January 2025? HMRC’s online Time to Pay system lets self-assessment taxpayers
19/12/2024 - More...
Navigating tax obligations can be daunting for small business owners and sole traders. To make life easier, HMRC has
With our newsletter, you automatically receive our latest news per e-mail and get access to the archive including advanced search options!
» Sign up for the Newsletter
» Login